Fasttrack schedule 2020 full#

Fasttrack schedule 2020 full#

Silver did that on 26 February, and within 4 days she received the green light to submit a full proposal. Instead, investigators send in a brief description-Silver's initial idea ran 1.5 pages-to the relevant program officer, who holds the reins. In a departure from NSF's usual grantsmaking process, RAPID proposals don't get reviewed by outside experts. For most of the past decade, the success rate for RAPID proposals has topped 90%-it was an incredible 98% in 2013, for example, and 97% in 2017. And the competition in 2018 was stiffer than usual. (That success rate is based on a pool of proposals that have already made it through a preliminary vetting by NSF program staff.) That's roughly three times better than the NSF-wide average for all research proposals. In 2018, NSF funded 78% of the 276 RAPID proposals it received. And the program's history-it began in 1990 as part of a broader initiative and was reformulated in 2009-suggests their chances of success are very high. Based on an average award size of $89,000-there's a $200,000 cap-the new stimulus funds could give 840 scientists an opportunity to launch studies relating to COVID-19. Last year, NSF spent about $10 million on 118 RAPID awards. 'We've used it many times to collect an initial round of data, and then follow up with a regular proposal to NSF to continue the work.' Almost a sure bet 'It's been an invaluable way to get into the field right away,' Silver says about RAPID. But it promises to supercharge a little-used funding mechanism at NSF that has been around for decades. The money is a tiny slice of the $2 trillion stimulus package crafted by legislators to help the country deal with-and ultimately recover from-the pandemic. And this week, Congress gave NSF an extra $75 million to spend on research that will help 'prevent, prepare for, and respond' to the novel coronavirus. Silver is one of a dozen investigators to date who have received RAPID awards relating to COVID-19. On 6 March she sent in her proposal, and 1 week later NSF awarded her $200,000 to begin a study on the long-term impacts of one's initial response to the pandemic. Over the past 3 decades, Silver has used the mechanism seven times to field surveys immediately after mass shootings, hurricanes, and the September 2001 terrorist attacks. It's called Rapid Response Research (RAPID). So it was a no-brainer for the social psychologist at the University of California, Irvine, to ask the National Science Foundation (NSF) to fund a study of how the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic would affect the well-being of Americans.ДЇortunately for Silver, NSF has a mechanism for fast-tracking time-sensitive ideas like hers.

Roxane Silver studies the health effects of traumatic life events.